<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/vendor/feed/atom.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
                        <id>https://bombich.com/blog/feed</id>
                                <link href="https://bombich.com/blog/feed" rel="self"></link>
                                <title><![CDATA[Bombich Software Blog]]></title>
                    
                                <subtitle>News and tips from the experts at Carbon Copy Cloner.</subtitle>
                                                    <updated>2025-03-31T14:00:00+00:00</updated>
                        <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Celebrate World Backup Day with CCC 7.1: New Features, Fun Customizations and Some Spring Cleaning Tips]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://bombich.com/blog/2025/03/31/celebrate-world-backup-day-with-ccc-7.1" />
            <id>https://bombich.com/2025/03/31/celebrate-world-backup-day-with-ccc-7.1</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[Mike Bombich]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<p>Every March 31st, we celebrate World Backup Day, a day to show
our love for our data and how important it is to keep it safe. To
kick off that celebration, we're releasing CCC 7.1, loaded with
<a href=
"https://support.bombich.com/hc/articles/20686469389719-CCC-7-Release-Notes">
some great improvements and a handful of new features</a>. And
since it's spring, we have a little Easter egg too and some helpful
tips for spring cleaning your Mac.</p>
<img src="https://bombich.com/img/blog/wbd2025/bunny_scientist.jpg"
class="max-w-[128]">
<h2>What's hatching in CCC 7.1?</h2>
<p>Thanks to some new macOS functionality, CCC no longer has to
install its <a href=
"https://support.bombich.com/hc/articles/20686388957719-What-is-CCC-s-Privileged-Helper-Tool">
privileged helper tool</a> in a special system folder. The helper
tool will still be registered with macOS, but it'll stay inside the
CCC app bundle. This new way of doing things fixes a bunch of
issues that have come up over the years with the old LaunchDaemon
setup as Apple has improved macOS platform security. That
perplexing "A macOS System problem prevented CCC from installing
its helper tool" dialog is a thing of the past. It also gets rid of
some Full Disk Access headaches — CCC's helper tool no longer needs
its own Full Disk Access permission. Sadly, that means we're saying
goodbye to <a href="/img/blog/wbd2025/modified-tuna.png">the CCC
Privacy Fish</a>! No...</p>
</body>
</html>]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2025-03-31T14:00:00+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Bootable backups have been deprecated for several years]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://bombich.com/blog/2024/12/19/bootable-backups-have-been-deprecated-for-several-years" />
            <id>https://bombich.com/2024/12/19/bootable-backups-have-been-deprecated-for-several-years</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[Mike Bombich]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<p>While some developers seem surprised by a change in macOS 15.2,
we've known for several years that making bootable backups would
eventually become impossible. We shifted CCC's strategy away from
relying on External Boot so our users wouldn't be affected by this
inevitable result.</p>
<hr>
<p>I took a few days off last week to help a family member, and
returned to find the Mac community all aflutter with comments about
bootable backups not working after the 15.2 update and comparisons
of Apple to The Grinch. After reviewing a lot of comments on this
subject, I felt it was time to weigh in. Apple is taking a lot of
heat for this "bug" in 15.2, but if there is any finger-pointing
here, I think it should be directed towards any developers that
have misled their users into believing that ASR and "bootable
backups" had any place in a backup/recovery strategy post-Big
Sur.</p>
<h3>This result does not come as a surprise</h3>
<p>Several years ago I wrote a blog post about the macOS Big Sur
changes that affected how third-party developers would be able to
make copies of the System:</p>
<p><a target="_blank" rel="noreferer noopener" href=
"https://bombich.com/blog/2021/05/19/beyond-bootable-backups-adapting-recovery-strategies-evolving-platform">
Beyond Bootable Backups: Adapting recovery strategies for an
evolving...</a></p>
</body>
</html>]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2024-12-19T09:46:51+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[File Copying Olympics: How File Size Impacts the Race for Performance Gold]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://bombich.com/blog/2024/08/27/file-copying-olympics-how-file-size-impacts-race-for-performance-gold" />
            <id>https://bombich.com/2024/08/27/file-copying-olympics-how-file-size-impacts-race-for-performance-gold</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[Mike Bombich]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<p>I had the opportunity to evaluate <a href=
"https://oyendigital.com/hard-drives/store/U34-BK.html">the new U34
Bolt from Oyen</a>, and I was only disappointed that this device
doesn't literally scream or burn a hole through the desk. While
delivering a stunning 3.1GB/s of sustained throughput, it was
completely silent and no warmer than a cup of coffee (120°F/49°C).
As exciting as that was, though, I thought this would be a good
opportunity to explore why we don't always see peak performance
from a storage device.</p>
<hr>
<p><i>Please note that we never accept any type of compensation for
product recommendations. The only benefit we receive from
recommendations is positive experiences with our software.</i></p>
<hr>
<h3>Interface performance vs. device performance vs. filesystem
performance vs. software performance</h3>
<p>Perhaps once a month we'll get a comment, "Black Magic Speed
Test shows XX MB/s, but the backup only gets YY MB/s. What gives?".
Less frequently people will wonder how to find that 40Gb/s
performance that Thunderbolt boasts. First, let's address the math
that may not be obvious. "Gb/s" is not the same as "GB/s"; Gb/s is
"Gigabits per second", GB/s is "Gigabytes per second". There are 8
bits in a byte, so 40Gb/s is comparable to 5GB/s. But, interface
performance isn't...</p>
</body>
</html>]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2024-08-27T10:00:00+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Building Better Backups with CCC 7]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://bombich.com/blog/2024/05/07/building-better-backups-ccc-7" />
            <id>https://bombich.com/2024/05/07/building-better-backups-ccc-7</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[Mike Bombich]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<p>There's one aspect of our company that I take a lof of pride in:
our engineering team works directly with end users to solve
problems and to create backup strategies. We don't have multiple
tiers of support and focus groups, no chat bots or AI – we just
talk directly with people. With that feedback going directly into
product development, we're constantly polishing every aspect of CCC
so that it works exactly the way it feels like it should. We want
your backups to be successful, and we feel personally accountable
for your success.</p>
<p>One common pattern of feedback we've gotten is that getting a
backup volume formatted can be kind of challenging. What partition
scheme to use, which format, how many volumes, which volume for
what purpose – it can add up to a lot of decisions and steps! It's
also too easy to do it in a suboptimal way, and not realize that
your backup strategy is missing some key feature.</p>
<p><strong>Today we're introducing CCC 7</strong>, which is loaded
with new features and enhancements specifically designed to help
you build a robust, flexible and successful backup strategy. At the
top of the list is a backup volume setup...</p>
</body>
</html>]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2024-05-09T15:00:19+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Revisit your backup strategy on World Backup Day]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://bombich.com/blog/2023/03/30/revisit-your-backup-strategy-on-world-backup-day" />
            <id>https://bombich.com/2023/03/30/revisit-your-backup-strategy-on-world-backup-day</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[Mike Bombich]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<p>We're on the eve of World Backup Day – March 31st (because
you're an April Fool if you didn't back up on March 31), so now is
a great time to revisit some Backup Best Practices. If you're
already using CCC for your backups, you've got a great leg up! If
you haven't given it a whirl yet, today is a great day to <a href=
"https://bombich.com/download">try it out</a>.</p>
<p>We all want our backups to protect our data; that's the obvious
reason for making them. But we also want them to be reliable, easy
to use, fast, and generally out of sight. It's like that furnace in
your attic – you want to know that it's working, but you don't want
to have to think about it every day. Once a year, though, maybe you
should give it some attention to make sure the condensate isn't
going to start leaking through the ceiling. (Yes, that's a very
specific analogy 😉)</p>
<p>Here are a few suggestions to get your backup strategy in
top-shape.</p>
<h3>Create a backup on directly-attached storage</h3>
<p>NAS and cloud-based backups feel really convenient – until you
have to restore a lot of data from them, or migrate that
data...</p>
</body>
</html>]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2023-03-30T17:55:43+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Folders with high file counts]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://bombich.com/blog/2023/01/18/folders-high-file-counts" />
            <id>https://bombich.com/2023/01/18/folders-high-file-counts</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[Mike Bombich]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<p>We field a lot of support requests, and similar to a doctor's
office, we see some extreme cases. One of those interesting extreme
cases are folders with high file counts. Any time a folder has more
than a few thousand items in it, the filesystem is going to be a
lot slower when working with that folder. Adding a new file, for
example, requires that the filesystem compare the new item name to
the name of every other file in the folder to check for conflicts,
so trivial tasks like that will take progressively longer as the
file count increases. Gathering the enormous file list will also
take progressively longer as the list gets larger. The performance
hit is even more noticeable on rotational disks and network
volumes, so we often see these sticking out in backup tasks.</p>
<h3>Sometimes high folder counts can bring a backup task to a
halt</h3>
<div class="img-shadow"><img alt=
"Task encountering a folder with a high file count" src=
"https://bombich.com/img/blog/high-folder-count.jpg" width=
"846"></div>
<p>Last week, one of our users found the task as shown above. Upon
closer analysis, we determined that the "media" folder had 181,274
files in it. In other words, more than 10% of the files on
the...</p>
</body>
</html>]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2023-01-18T17:20:24+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CCC 6.1.3 adds official support for macOS Ventura]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://bombich.com/blog/2022/10/18/ccc-6.1.3-adds-official-support-macos-ventura" />
            <id>https://bombich.com/2022/10/18/ccc-6.1.3-adds-official-support-macos-ventura</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[Mike Bombich]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<div class="img-shadow"><img alt="CCC is ready for macOS Ventura"
src="https://bombich.com/img/blog/ready_for_ventura.jpg" width=
"800"></div>
<p>It's Fall here on the top of the globe, which means that temps
are getting cooler, pumpkin seems to be in everything, and apples
are in season. And of course, Apple is about to drop another new
upgrade to macOS: Ventura. We've been testing the new OS over the
summer, and I'm pleased to report that <a href=
"/kb/ccc6/release-notes#6.1.3">CCC is ready to protect your data
before and after you apply this upgrade</a>&nbsp;– <strong>we added
official Ventura support to CCC 6.1.3, which we posted back in
September</strong>.</p>
<p>Every year we make a handful of changes to CCC to support
changes that Apple makes in the new OS. We have a mixed bag this
year, and I wanted to point out just a couple things that work a
little differently. Overall, the changes are pretty bland, which
means this article will not be very exciting. So to spice things
up, I added a recipe for Pumpkin Spice Muffins at the bottom.</p>
<h3>System Preferences → System Settings</h3>
<p>The name change seems innocuous, but the changes that Apple made
to this application are really significant. Initially I was really
flustered with the new layout. I...</p>
</body>
</html>]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2022-10-18T15:52:22+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
    </feed>
